Dalhousie University

ListServ Home Page

   
 

Help for APLA-LIST Archives


APLA-LIST Archives

APLA-LIST Archives


APLA-LIST@KIL-LSV-2.ITS.DAL.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

APLA-LIST Home

APLA-LIST Home

APLA-LIST  July 2004

APLA-LIST July 2004

Subject:

Re: My two cents worth

From:

Nathalie Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:07:26 -0300

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (153 lines)

Hello all,

I have been following this debate with much interest, but I am noticing that
the "debate" is on the verge of turning into an "argument". I agree with
Ryan  that he seems to be singled out, and some of the comments definitely
indicate that some people are NOT reading the messages thoroughly before
they post a reply, especially as to the definition/explanation of what a
"professional" library worker is exactly. Please everyone, take the time to
read the messages thoroughly before any of you send a rebuttal/reply, and
please please please, no insults or accusations. I have seen this happen
much too often on these types of forums, mostly because the person is
somewhat "invisible" on the web. We talk of varieties of "professionalism",
well, if you want to behave in a "professional manner", send replies that
are well thought-out and considerate. Aside from the "facts" of the matter,
everyone is also entitled to an opinion on any subject, including this one.
Remember that body language and tone of voice are non-existent on the
Internet, and it is sometimes dangerous to assume the meaning or tone behind
an e-mail message. I know we all know this already, and this is but a gently
reminder on my part as I watch a healthy debate and discussion slowly going
downhill. Personal attacks may also discourage some people from posting, as
they may fear a personal attack on them (I admit I am one of these people,
and post this message with much trepidation).

For the record, I am a librarian (graduated 1999), and I can see both sides
of the issue on this (but am obviously more informed when it comes to
librarians since that is what I am), but my opinion (I said opinion) on this
issue is that there SHOULD be a difference between what a tech is assigned
to do and what a librarian is assigned to do. I didn't spend 8 years (should
have been 6 but my undergrad took a while...) in university to do the same
exact work and receive the same exact paycheck as someone who has spent 2
years in college. If I did, I would have gone to college and be able to pay
off my student loan before I reach 50 (and the way it's going, that's how
long it will take!), and I would not expect the level of responsabilities
that I now shoulder in my position.

Again, this is my personal opinion. Believe me, I've met librarians who have
little passion for their job and do the very minimum they are required to
do, and I've met techs who have literally blown me away and put many
librarians to shame (can you say lesson in humility?). I just think the
level of education (as it applies to any profession) should account for
something in life, regardless of what the realities of the job market are in
our field (as well as many other fields, as has been aptly pointed out by
many people). As it has been mentioned, if you do your job very well, you
will find work whether you are a tech or a librarian. Having a Masters'
degree does not mean that you are a better person or better employee than
someone with a college degree - that is not relevant. And although many
tasks DO overlap when you compare what a tech does and what a librarian
does, if the two programs were exactly alike, why would they both exist? If
that were the case, there would only be one program for all library workers.
I have seen techs and librarians work harmoniously side by side, and
complement each other extremely well in their positions - and that is what
(in my opinion) should be happening! Librarians and techs COMPLEMENTING each
other make for a dynamic, productive, efficient and effective team. And to
me, that's what it's all about - teamwork.

Please be kind with your replies! I realise not everyone will agree with me,
but it's my opinion, and I hope my opinion will be respected as I strive to
respect the opinions of others as well.

Nathalie Richard


----- Original Message -----
From: "barbara emodi" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 19 July, 2004 3:52 PM
Subject: My two cents worth


> Hi,
>
> I have watched this dialogue with interest and have decided to jump in. I
am
> a professional in other fields and have decided recently to go back to
> school to do the tech's course. The reasons I made this choice and my
> perspectives on how employers view professionals may add something. First
I
> already have two degrees, one a masters. I have taught as a tenured member
> of a school of architecture, worked for the government. written for both
> Halifax newspapers, worked with Nortel engineering staff writing online
> classes and been a national marketing manager for a German multi-national.
> What I am trying to say is that my experience is with a variety of
employers
> and am aware of how the labour market and ways of work are changing. I
feel
> that the present discussion fits into that context.
>
> First apart from pay rates much of the discussion of professionalism in
> librarianship is academic. To compare the profession of librarianship to
> medicine or dentistry or law is silly. Ryan are you prepared to pay
$80,000
> professional libability insurance ? Is there a statute that defines the
> profession? Are you legally liable for suit for your entire career if you
> make a mistake on the job, and does the law extend this liability to your
> heirs? It is entirely reasonable and sensible to want to be paid and
> respected for knowledge, experience and expertise. It is annoying and
unfair
> to see a graduate education passed over for undergraduate level training.
We
> all hate that, any occupation hates that. Any architect who makes half as
> much income as his plumber hates it. But welcome to the world. Thinking
that
> you can put "pressure" on employers to recognize professionalism will be
> seen as pompous and irrelevant. If you are good you will find work. If you
> deliver value for money (which after all is what a salary is) you will be
> compensated. If you don't like the compensation it is up to you to find a
> work that has compensation you like. None of this is fair or about
> professionalism at all. There are outstanding and deeply professional day
> care workers who get minimium wage; there are unprofessional and unethical
> operators who make fortunes. That is wrong and we all need to think about
> the values that society places are work. Taking care of property means
more
> than taking care of children for example.
>
> Truth is that there are very, very few institutions or organizations that
> have unlimited funds. Every library I know is trying to make do with less
> than they need. In most businesses the biggest costs are labour costs.
> That's why the first thing to go is staff, ask the 10,000 who went from
> Nortel's US operations. Therefore the cheaper labour, in this market will
be
> hired first. Only when the accountability or detail of the work, most
often
> at a management level requires more expensive labour will it be hired.
Don't
> expect any library to hire librarians over techs on the principle of
> professionalism if the cost is fewer aquisitions or fewer services. Expect
> librarians to be hired if necessary, and techs if possible. If you insist
on
> drawing medical analogies look at what is happening in hospitals, RNs are
> hired only when LPNs can't do the job, hospital sitters are now replacing
> LPNs when possible. Its called stretching the public dollar as far as it
> will go. Try putting pressure on those employers, ask the NSGEU how that
> battle goes.
>
> Which brings me to what being a professional is. You know Ryan there isn't
> an ALA guideline in the world that can enforce or make up for real
> professionalism. It is one of those things that you know you have. What we
> all should aspire to is being a pro. To be a pro at whatever the job title
> is a goal that is worth a career. If you have it, no one can take it away
> from you and no policy statement in the world can make up for it if it's
not
> there.
>
> So why did I decide to take the Lib Tech course? I felt that the
employment
> opportunities were greater. I know when I finish my course and transfer
from
> this field to libraries that I will be taking an enormous pay cut, with
all
> the implications that has for my life. However life is about choices and I
> have decided I want to work in a library. It is what I really want to do.
>
> Barbara

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008, Week -19
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.DAL.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager