Dalhousie University

LISTSERV Home Page

   
 

Help for FABLIST Archives


FABLIST Archives

FABLIST Archives


FABLIST@KIL-LSV-2.ITS.DAL.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FABLIST Home

FABLIST Home

FABLIST  April 2002

FABLIST April 2002

Subject:

Oregon Law On Assisted Suicides Upheld

From:

Laura Shanner <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Feminist Approaches to Bioethics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:49:07 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (145 lines)

FYI

>Received from Jack Freer, Bioethics Bulletin

===============================================================

>Washington Post
>
>Ore. Law On Assisted Suicides Upheld
>
>By William Booth
>
>
>  LOS ANGELES, April 17 -- A federal judge in Portland ruled today that
> the Bush administration lacks the authority to overturn a voter-backed
> Oregon law permitting physician-assisted suicide.
>
>  U.S. District Judge Robert Jones scolded Attorney General John D.
> Ashcroft, saying that the federal government was attempting to usurp the
> rights of a state when the Justice Department announced its intent to
> prosecute doctors who prescribe lethal doses of drugs to their terminally
> ill and dying patients.
>
>  "The citizens of Oregon, through their democratic initiative process,
> have chosen to resolve the moral, legal and ethical debate on
> physician-assisted suicide for themselves by voting -- not once, but
> twice -- in favor of the Oregon act," Jones wrote in his order.
>
>  Jones said that Ashcroft attempted to "stifle an ongoing, earnest and
> profound debate in the various states concerning physician-assisted
> suicide," and that "with no advance warning . . . fired the first shot in
> the battle between the state of Oregon and the federal government."
>
>  Oregon is the only state to have legalized physician-assisted suicide --
> an immensely controversial practice that raises ethical, medical and
> religious questions about the appropriate role for doctors in hastening
> or forbidding what advocates call "an early exit." Today's decision was a
> clear victory for advocates of allowing doctors to prescribe drugs to
> hasten an inevitable death. But this will not end the debate in the
> courts, in Washington and in hospital corridors.
>
>  The Justice Department is considering an appeal, said Robert McCallum,
> an assistant attorney general. It would be heard by the 9th Circuit Court
> in San Francisco, and the process would likely take about 18 months.
> Meanwhile, the Oregon law remains in force, and other states are
> considering similar measures.
>
>  McCallum repeated the administration's contention that "assisting
> suicide is not medicine."
>
>  "Terminally ill patients are among the most vulnerable members of our
> society," he said. "Medical studies make clear that these individuals
> often suffer from undiagnosed depression and inadequately treated pain. A
> just and caring society should do its best to assist in coping with the
> problems that afflict the terminally ill. It should not abandon or assist
> in killing them."
>
>  Oregon voters first approved the Death With Dignity Act in 1994, and
> then again three years later after a failed legal challenge.
>
>  Under that law, a patient who seeks a prescription for lethal drugs must
> be shown to be mentally competent and must have, in the opinion of two
> doctors, less than six months to live. Although doctors prescribe the
> powerful sedatives or narcotics, they are not allowed to administer them
> to cause death.If the patient is incapable of taking the drugs without
> aid, a friend or relative may help.
>
>  In the past four years, 91 people in Oregon have chosen to end their
> lives with the help of their physicians, according to records kept by the
> state.
>
>  "The system has worked in Oregon," said Kathryn Tucker, one of the
> attorneys who defended the law in court and the director of legal affairs
> for the group Compassion in Dying Federation.
>
>  Tucker said that the number of patients choosing suicide has been
> relatively low and that there have not been allegations of abuse or
coercion.
>
>  Opponents of physician-assisted suicide decried the court action.
>
>  Burke Balch, a director of the National Right to Life Committee, said,
> "The American people do not want their federal government to facilitate
> euthanasia." Balch said he was confident the decision would be reversed
> on appeal.
>
>  Jan LaRue, a director of the Family Research Council, said, "Medicine by
> definition is the art of treating and curing. Drugs are for curing, not
> killing."
>
>  During the Clinton administration, Attorney General Janet Reno concluded
> that the federal government could not bar Oregon doctors from prescribing
> drugs to hasten death.
>
>  But in November, Ashcroft ordered Drug Enforcement Administration agents
> to pursue cases against such doctors. Ashcroft argued that the lethal
> prescriptions served no "legitimate medical purpose" and violated the
> federal Controlled Substances Act, whose primary purpose is to regulate
> drugs that can be abused, from marijuana to prescription pain killers.
>
>  Oregon Attorney General Hardy Myers immediately went to court and
> challenged the "Ashcroft directive," and Jones issued a temporary
> restraining order against Ashcroft in November. Today, Jones ruled again
> for the state, blocking the federal government from pursuing Oregon
doctors.
>
>  Jones said he was not required to rule on the practice of
> physician-assisted suicide, but a narrower point of law -- whether the
> federal government, through the Controlled Substances Act, can seek to
> bar physicians from writing prescriptions to assist in suicide.
>
>  Jones concluded that the Controlled Substances Act, as well as
> legislative history behind the act, did not support the Ashcroft
> directive. The federal government, Jones wrote, is not authorized "to act
> as a national medical board" and regulate how physicians treat their
patients.
>
>  Steve Bushong, a deputy Oregon attorney general who has defended the
> state law, argued that Congress intended only to prevent illegal
> drug-trafficking by doctors under the Controlled Substances Act, and it
> left any decisions about medical practice up to the states.
>
>  Alan Bates, a physician and a member of the Oregon Legislature, said
> today's ruling "allows us to continue to practice medicine without fear
> of losing our licenses." He warned that "once you start telling
> physicians how to handle their patients, you've made a huge mistake."
>
>  Supporters of the Oregon law said a ruling in favor of Ashcroft could
> have had a chilling effect on the care of gravely ill patients because
> doctors might fear that prescribing too much pain medication could invite
> federal prosecution.
>
>  McCallum, the assistant attorney general, made clear that was not the
> intent of the Justice Department, saying that appropriate use of pain
> medications was "one of the most important positive alternatives to
suicide."
>
>  Jones said he understood that society has not settled its mind on the
> question. "My task is not to criticize those who oppose the concept of
> assisted suicide for any reason," Jones wrote. "Many of our citizens,
> including the highest respected leaders of this country, oppose assisted
> suicide. But the fact that opposition to assisted suicide may be fully
> justified, morally, ethically, religiously or otherwise, does not permit
> a federal statute to be manipulated from its true meaning to satisfy even
> a worthy goal."

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2025
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
March 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
June 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.DAL.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager