Dalhousie University

LISTSERV Home Page

   
 

Help for FABLIST Archives


FABLIST Archives

FABLIST Archives


FABLIST@KIL-LSV-2.ITS.DAL.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FABLIST Home

FABLIST Home

FABLIST  February 2001

FABLIST February 2001

Subject:

Global Repro Health Forum:The Global Gag Rule

From:

Laura Shanner <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Feminist Approaches to Bioethics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:45:31 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (84 lines)

----- Original Message -----
From: grhf <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 6:23 AM
Subject: GRHF News: Week 2 Discussion- The Global Gag Rule


Global Reproductive Health Forum News: Week 2- The Global Gag Rule

As of today, Reproductive Rights, Human Rights has 63 registered members.
Thanks to those who have registered and responded thus far, the discussion
is off to a great start! The forum from last week will remain open, so feel
free to respond to the questions that were brought up last week throughout
the six week period.

To participate in the discussion, please visit
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/grhf/discuss

Week 2: The Mexico City Policy/Global Gag Rule

In a controversial political  move, the "global gag rule" was reinstated in
an executive order signed by President George W. Bush on January 22, 2001 in
his first act as US President. First implemented by Ronald Reagan in 1984,
this act prevents any US funds from being directed to organizations that
"perform or support" abortion services worldwide. When former President
Clinton took office in 1993, his first official act was to repeal the gag
rule. Opponents of the gag rule feel that there are two main effects. The
first is to reduce the funds available to organizations working in
Reproductive Health who are not willing to deny their clients access to
information about legal, safe abortion services. The second is to increase
the number of abortions performed in unsafe conditions, and consequently,
cause an increase maternal mortality rates.

Janet Benshoof, president of the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy,
writes: "Thousands of women will die each year from illegal abortion because
President Bush, who lost the popular vote, needs to curry favor with the
religious right. It is a malicious affront to women to gag advocates for
their health on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade."* Opponents of the global
gag rule emphasizes that the legislation will hurt organizations that
provide a wide variety of reproductive health-related services, such as
contraceptive options and family planning counseling. But others believe
that the reinstatement of the global gag rule will in fact benefit people in
the developing world. Steve Mosher, President of the Population Research
Institute, writes that "the massive promotion of abortion, contraception,
and sterilization by the U.S. and its surrogates has not helped the
developing world rid itself of poverty and disease.  Rather it has offended
traditional values and customs, wasted taxpayer dollars, and undermined
primary health care."**

Discussion Questions:

1) What are the implications of the global gag rule? What kind of an impact
will this legislation have on the developing world? We would particularly
like to hear from participants in the developing world, as they have
first-hand knowledge of the implicationsS

2) If reproductive health is truly a human right, then the denial of
reproductive health services (or the denial of funding for reproductive
health services) is a violation of human rights. Is this policy inconsistent
with both the UN Convention on Human Rights and the US Constitution that
guarantees freedom of speech?

3) President Bush campaigned as a pro-life candidate. As President, he
believes that the enactment of legislation like the global gag rule is the
only way to fulfill his campaign promises, and reduce the incidence of
abortions. Will the enactment of the global gag rule lead to an increase or
decrease in the total number of  abortions and maternal deaths through a
reduction of funds available for family planning and reproductive health
services? Is there any evidence based on the history of the gag rule under
former Presidents Reagan and Bush?


*More information from the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy is
available in the resources section.

** The full text of the statement in support of the Mexico City Policy by
the Population Research Institute can be found in the resources section.


To participate in the discussion, please visit
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/grhf/discuss

The Global Reproductive Health Forum is located at
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/grhf

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2025
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
March 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
June 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.DAL.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager